January 2014 Podcast – Transcript
Highlights
Hello, I’m Andrew Amos and this is the January 2014 edition of Australian Psychatry Review. The review closes with a focus section on illicit substance induced psychosis. Highlights from the literature include the ANZJP’s announcement of a series looking forward to the ICD-11, alongside the research plans of the winners of John Cade Fellowships in 2013. The AJP considers efforts to enact Kendra’s law in New York state, requiring outpatient treatment for for patients with severe mental illness. The BJP reports that parents can successfully deliver CBT to anxious minors, guided by professionals, and that community treatment orders appear to increase coercion without improving mental health. Translational Psychiatry includes a report that omega-3 fatty acids and multivitamins can worsen psychotic symptoms when added to antipsychotic medications.
Australian Psychiatric Journals
Turning now to the Australian psychiatric literature.
ANZJP
In an editorial marking the new year, Editor of the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry Gin Malhi looks back to the journal’s series of DSM 5 digests, and heralds the arrival of the ICD-11 expected in 2015.1 Under the rubric of “ICD Insights” the journal will feature ongoing correspondence and perspectives on the ICD-11 highlighting changes and potential improvements on the DSM-5, starting with three letters in this issue.
There are two Viewpoints by Middleton and colleagues which outline the background and framework of the Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Abuse.2,3 The commission was triggered mainly by concern regarding abuse within religious institutions, but Middleton and colleagues note that its reach potentially involves all institutions involved in the care of children, whether they supported the abuse or did not respond appropriately to its disclosure. They propose that there has been an institutional reflex to respond to allegations of abuse by diversion, suppression, and denial, with sometimes tragic results for victims and investigators. Middleton and colleagues suggest the Commission take lessons from South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission, including granting amnesty to those willing to fully confess their transgressions, valuing the validation of victims and prevention of future wrongs over the prosecution of all perpetrators. The authors also consider the Commission a necessary first step into the broader but more difficult area of abuse within families.
Editorials by McGrath4 and Christensen5 outline the 5-year research programmes of these winners of the John Cade fellowships in 2013. Both winners focus on structuring research to achieve the best results for patients with severe mental illness. McGrath emphasises the importance of identifying and measuring modifiable risk factors. He uses vitamin D deficiency as an example, described as a potential risk factor for schizophrenia in 1999 but only this year supported by strong evidence that low prenatal vitamin D impairs brain development in rodents. McGrath proposes to use the McCade fellowship to explore the possibility that vitamin D replacement in at-risk perinatal populations may reduce the incidence or severity of neurodevelopmental disorders including schizophrenia in the same way that folate supplementation has reduced the incidence of spina bifida. He identifies the importance of leveraging research by involving international collaborators exploring related hypotheses and structuring research to test multiple risk factors as part of the same design. He aspires to combine these ambitious research endeavours with initiatives in training and systems development, such as the massive open online course platform EdX, to foster the development of a clinical research talent pool amongst Queensland clinicians.
Christensen traces her Cade fellowship proposal to the question “How could you transform the mental health of Australians?”5 Her answer is that “The mental health of Australians [would] be radically transformed if it were possible to implement what we already know about preventing and treating the common mental health disorders.” Christensen proposes to use internet technologies to implement evidence-based prevention strategies at the population level and facilitate appropriate help-seeking. She notes the huge numbers required to achieve population level prevention in mental illness, which cannot be implemented by traditional face-to-face mental health workers, but which appear perfect for internet-based resources which can be massively expanded with minimal cost. Her proposal includes web-based resources as well as wearable sensors, mobile apps, and social media. It is significant that both proposals address networks across clinical, professional, and educational organisations, including the goal of generating new expertise and networks across domains through novel training initiatives.
International Psychiatric Journals
Turning now to the international psychiatric literature.
AJP – December 2013
In the December issue of the American Journal of Psychiatry Drake and Colleagues report an evaluation of the US Social Security Administration’s Mental Health Treatment Study, in which disability insurance beneficiaries with psychiatric diagnoses were randomised either to usual services, or to an intensive program including supported employment, systematic medication management, complete health insurance coverage with no out-of-pocket expenses and suspension of disability reviews.6 Over 2000 beneficiaries with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or depression participated, with higher rates of paid employment in the intervention group at 60% compared with 40% in the control group, as well as greater level and duration of work. The intervention group also achieved better mental health and quality of life than controls, with lower resource use of hospital days and emergency presentations. However, a related editorial by Frank7 notes that only 14% of beneficiaries approached agreed to participate in the trial, and those who did participate were younger, and more motivated to find work than those who declined. Furthermore, few of the participants achieved sufficient work to leave disability insurance. Frank concludes that with the best available programs, working with the most motivated patients, vocational interventions do not substantially change patients’ lives, and recommends a focus on early intervention with the goal of maintaining work, rather than returning to work after a convalescent period.
Swanson and colleagues report a cost analysis of assisted outpatient treatment in New York City.8 In 1999 the New York state legislature and 41 other American states enacted Kendra’s Law authorising assisted outpatient treatment for people with serious mental illness at risk of failing to live safely in the community. This system remains controversial and unimplemented in most states, with concerns about patient coercion as well as fears of managing potentially dangerous patients outside hospital. Research suggests assisted outpatient treatment can improve outcomes but only with adequate public funding. The authors analysed more than 600 patients across NYC and five counties in NY state and compared costs from 12 months before assisted outpatient treatment was initiated and for two subsequent 12 month periods. Patients were eligible if they had a history of non-adherence resulting in hospitalisation or incarceration, or if they had committed or threatened serious acts of violence in the previous 48 months, resulting in court orders generally issued for 6 months with the potential for extension. Previous research established that this treatment reduced hospitalisation, arrests, and adherence. These authors report that the programme reduced costs by more than 40% in the first year, and more than 13% in the second year. Voluntary participation in intensive treatment was also associated with reduced costs, but assisted outpatient treatment reduced costs twice as much.
BJP – December 2013
In the December 2013 British Journal of Psychiatry Thirlwall and colleagues report a randomized controlled trial which showed superior outcomes of parent-delivered CBT for paediatric anxiety compared to wait-list controls.9 194 children with a current anxiety disorder were randomised to full guided parent-delivered CBT, brief guided parent-delivered CBT, or wait-list control. The full guided CBT group achieved superior outcomes compared to wait-list controls, with 50% versus 25% levels of recovery. Thirlwall and colleagues note that outcomes were unrelated to level of therapist training and experience. A linked editorial by Cartwright-Hatton notes the prevalence of anxiety disorders in children, and highlights the importance of the Thirlwall finding, which indicates that CBT can be effectively delivered by non-professionals.10 The generalisability of the study may be limited by the exclusion of children whose primary carers were currently affected by an anxiety disorder.
Rugkasa and Dawson review the literature regarding community treatment orders, and conclude that evidence is scarce and has significant methodological limitations.11 While community treatment orders are sometimes presented as a less restrictive alternative to hospitalisation for managing risk, they emphasise that current evidence does not suggest that CTOs reduce hospitalisation, and refer to literature that suggests extending involuntary treatment to the community increases rather than reduces coercion. It appears that community treatment orders are supported by patient families but opposed by patient advocates, with the central conflict between the right to autonomy and the right of receiving adequate care. Rugkasa and Dawson conclude that it is intensive community treatment, not coercion via community treatment orders, that reduces hospitalisation.
Milner and colleagues report a systematic review and meta-analysis of suicide by occupation. Previous research has suggested that medical professionals, farmers, and police are at most risk, due to access to lethal means and stressful working conditions.12 The meta-analysis suggested that suicide rates were highest in occupations with the lowest skill levels, such as labourers, cleaners, and agricultural workers. The paper does not confirm the elevated risk for medical doctors, as it incorporates articles with both higher and lower risks of suicide for doctors. Differences in relative suicide risk between studies appears to be substantially due to the use of different comparison groups, with elevated risks in studies which used comparison groups with low suicide risk compared to whole working-age populations.
JAMA Psychiatry – December 2013
In the December 2013 issue of JAMA Psychiatry, Lane and colleagues report a novel adjunct agent which substantially improved symptoms and cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia.13 Using a cluster randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind design 52 Taiwanese patients with chronic schizophrenia stabilised on antipsychotic medications for at least 3 months were randomised to receive 6 weeks of augmenting sodium benzoate or placebo. Sodium benzoate was chosen as an agent which increases NMDA receptor stimulation, putatively correcting NMDA receptor underactivation in schizophrenia. Sodium benzoate inhibits D-amino acid oxidase, which itself degrades D-serine, an NMDA coagonist. By decreasing the degradation of D-serine, sodium benzoate increases the activation of NMDA receptors. Patients receiving sodium benzoate showed a 21% improvement in PANSS total scores and small to moderate effect sizes on multiple other clinical indicators of positive and negative symptoms, function, and quality of life, as well as increased processing speed and visual learning.
Kotov and colleagues seek to define the boundaries separating psychotic and affective disorders by charting the course of symptoms and outcomes of 413 patients presenting with first-episode psychosis over 10 years.14 They note three hypotheses regarding the relationship between psychosis and psychotic mood disturbance, from Kraepelin’s separation of dementia praecox from manic-depressive insanity as two qualitatively different conditions, through the DSM’s separation of schizophrenia from schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder as three qualitatively different conditions, to more recent conceptualisations of a continuum of mental illness from psychotic mood disorder to non-affective schizophrenia. They based their study on Kendell and Brockington’s proposal that these three hypotheses could be tested by examining the outcomes along the spectrum from non-affective schizophrenia to bipolar disorder. Natural boundaries between two or three qualitiatively different conditions would lead to discontinuous drops in outcome along the spectrum, while a continuum of illness would show a more linear decline. Consistent with a dichotomous model, Kotov and colleagues data on longitudinal course clearly distinguished psychotic and affective disorders, but did not separate schizophrenia from schizoaffective disorder. In fact, duration of psychosis was the most important predictor of outcome across diagnoses.
A related editorial by Kendler proposes that Kotov and colleagues’ paper supports the use of the non-affective psychosis ratio as a useful prognostic indicator, with proportion of psychosis occurring outside major mood episodes associated with worse outcomes.15 Kotov and colleagues suggest that with appropriate replication, their result suggests the elimination of schizoaffective disorder from psychiatric nosologies.14
Theorising that the expression of violence in patients with psychosis may be influenced by subgroups with different developmental trajectories, Winsper and colleagues show that premorbid levels of delinquency affected violent behaviour in first episode psychosis.16 High levels of premorbid delinquent behaviour independently predicted violent behaviour during the first episode, while the effect of moderate levels was partially mediated by positive symptoms of psychosis.
Investigating the neurobiologic basis of late-life depression, Wilson and colleagues tested the hypothesis that neurodegenerative processes are related to depressive symptoms by analysing the brains of 124 people without dementia from the Rush Memory and Aging project.17 They found that neurofibrillary tangles and Lewy bodies in the monoamingergic nuclei of the brain stem correlated with depressive symptoms, while the loss of tyrosine hydroxylase positive cells in the ventral tegmental area predicted severity of depression. The association with Lewy bodies was attenuated in those receiving antidepressant treatment. Wilson and colleagues conclude that the mesolimbic dopamine system is important in late-life depression.
Sigmon and colleagues randomised primary prescription opioid abusers to 1-, 2-, or 4-week detoxification using tapering doses of the opioid partial agonist buprenorphine followed by naltrexone maintenance treatment.18 Patients and physicians were blind to the placebo condition and speed of taper. The 4-week regimen showed significantly better outcomes than the shorter schedules, with 50% versus 20% abstinent and taking naltrexone at 3 month follow-up. Sigmon and colleagues note past research found transient better outcomes in heroin addicts with a 4 week than a one week tapering period, but note that this study was open label and did not include naltrexone maintenance.
Iltis and colleagues address the difficult problem of ethical research into psychiatric risk management.19 They illustrate the problem with the fact that the presence of suicidal ideation is a common exclusion criterion in antidepressant research. This means that evidence-based treatment of depressed patients with suicidal ideation relies upon generalisation from evidence about patients without suicidal ideation. Iltis and colleagues conclude that researchers must design ethical and methodologically sound experiments that do not ignore populations only because of the difficulties involved, including risks of poor outcomes. They suggest that risks of poor outcomes, such as suicide, be treated as negative outcomes of disease in the same way as other undesirable but expected outcomes such as post-operative infection. The alternative is that risk-aversion will continue to allow high-risk groups to be harmed because of inadequate knowledge about management of their risks. Iltis and colleagues provide practical approaches to identify, communicate, manage, and justify research risks, in order to promote greater examination of these neglected populations.
Girardin and colleagues examined the prevalence of drug-induced long QT by reviewing all ECGs of all patients at the public Psychiatric Hospital of Geneva who had ECG recordings at admission between 2004 and 2009.20 Patients with long QT were compared with a sample of patients with normal ECGs. Among close to 7000 patents 27% had abnormal ECGs, 1.6% had long QT, and 0.9% qualified as drug-induced long QT. There were significantly higher frequencies of hypokalaemia, hepatitis C, HIV, and abnormal T waves in patients with drug-induced long QT. Haloperidol, clotiapine, phenothiazines, citalopram, and escitalopram, were significantly more frequent in patients with drug-induced long QT even after adjustment for other factors. The paper also notes that long QT syndrome is the most common cause of marketed drug withdrawal.
Molecular Psychiatry – January 2014
The January 2014 issue of Molecular Psychiatry includes several aspirational editorials on the promise of translational psychiatry. Editor Julio Licinio and Wong declare that the time is right for a war on mental illness, with reference to the bracing effects of US President Nixon’s signing of the National Cancer Act in 1971 despite significant obstacles.21 They provide a useful summary of six principles of translational science, progressing through discovery, first in human studies, clinical trials, policy and guidelines, long-term effectiveness and safety, and ending with global health. They argue that there are three main translation gaps at present, in knowledge, practice, and adherence, and suggest a conceptual framework for translational psychiatry with attention to commercialisation as well as the need to manage potential conflicts of interest.
Poels and colleagues provide a systematic review of PET, SPECT, and MRS imaging evidence on the role of glutamate in schizophrenia.22 They canvas several advances in MRS and PET technologies and conclude that the evidence supports the theory of NMDA receptor hypofunction in schizophrenia, involving interaction between dopamine and glutamate systems.
Neuropsychopharmacology – January 2014
In January Neuropsychopharmacology pioneers a new segment that integrates opposing viewpoints on controversial topics by inviting comment by two leading researchers followed by a jointly written synthesis. Wise and Koob provide the first, on the development and maintenance of drug addiction, continuing their long-standing debate on whether the positive reinforcement of drug-induced euphoria or the negative reinforcement of substance use in withdrawal is more important in maintaining addictive behaviour.23 Wise argues that whatever the negative reinforcing properties associated with avoidance of drug withdrawal, it cannot explain the acquisition of dependence which necessarily occurs before withdrawal. He describes his research in rats, where simple exposure to strongly reinforcing substances such as amphetamines appears sufficient to induce addictive behaviour in close to 100% of subjects. No negative reinforcement is needed to acquire dependence. Koob conceputalises addiction as a three stage cycle, moving from binge/intoxication, through withdrawal/negative affect, to preoccupation/anticipation, with stages worsening over time and leading from impulsive to compulsive habitual behaviour.
Translational Psychiatry
In December Translational Psychiatry published online a trial by Bentsen and colleagues which randomised adults with schizophrenia to omega-3 fatty acids, with or without multivitamins, versus placebo, for 16 weeks.24 All patients also took antipsychotics. They were surprised to report that, for patients with low red blood cell fatty acid levels at baseline, adding one but not both of fatty acids or multivitamins increased patient dropout and worsened psychotic symptoms versus placebo or both agents together. Bentsen and colleagues note that theirs is the first study to show fatty acids worsening psychotic illness and adherence, and speculate that this may be because their study initiated treatment during psychotic exacerbations, which may increase oxidative stress, or because of the relatively higher dietary fatty acids of the Norwegian patients studied. Oxidative stress due to fatty acids or multivitamins could disturb neuronal and glial function, inhibit NMDA receptors, and impair dopamine modulation, worsening psychotic symptoms.
Mainstream Medical Journals
MJA
The 16th December issue of the Medical Journal of Australia includes an editorial by Gillian Triggs, President of the Australian Human Rights Commission on the mental health effects of closed detention for immigrants in Australia.25 A perspective by Procter and colleagues looks more specifically at efforts to prevent suicide and self-harm for immigrants in detention, finding that suicide is the leading cause of premature death in this population,26 while Deans and colleagues report the incidence of mental illness amongst asylum seekers presenting to the Royal Darwin Hospital emergency department.27 Together, these articles suggest both a high incidence of mental illness amongst asylum seekers in Australia, and suggest approaches to improve outcomes, starting with improved monitoring to identify detainees at greater risk allowing selective interventions, and including increased use of community detention and bridging visas.
JAMA
In the December 25 issue of JAMA Foa and colleagues report positive results from a randomised controlled trial of prolonged exposure therapy for female adolescent survivors of sexual abuse.28 61 girls aged 13-18 years were randomised to 14 weeks of prolonged exposure therapy or supportive counselling using a block design. Prolonged exposure involved gradually increasing contact with triggers for PTSD symptoms and detailed voluntary recall of abuse events, without delay for extensive training in arousal reduction strategies. The prolonged exposure group achieved better outcomes than controls, with 83% no longer meeting criteria for PTSD compared to 54% in controls, with gains maintained at 12 months. In line with many recent studies, interventions were delivered by inexperienced therapists. A related editorial by Perrin suggests Foa and colleagues’ results are consistent with a large body of evidence justifying the use of prolonged exposure therapy as a first-line treatment for PTSD in adults.29 Perrin also argues that these results should allay clinician concerns about retraumatising abused individuals, which sometimes leads to significant delays in efficacious treatment.
Lancet
In the December 7th Lancet Vincent and colleagues30 comment upon the recent meta-analysis of antipsychotics by Leucht and colleagues which used a Bayesian framework to indirectly compare antipsychotics from different trials.31 This meta-analysis challenged the classification of antipsychotics into first- and second-generation groups, finding best efficacy in clozapine, amisulpride, and olanzapine, and worst discontinuation in haloperidol. Vincent and colleagues speculate that the finding that the five newest antipsychotics showed the least efficacy and the least discontinuation is a product of poor adherence associated with more demanding administration regimes and less tolerable side-effects prior to reaching therapeutic doses. Leucht and colleagues reinforce this point,32 and reply to the criticism by Siu and colleagues33 that their paper does not include a complete matrix of comparisons between antipsychotic medications with the observation that they have acknowledged the limitations of their methodology, which is as complete as is currently possible.
The December 7 Lancet also includes an ambitious statement of intent by a Commission established by the journal to revisit the global case for investment in health.34 The review makes the case for dramatic health gains achievable by 2035 including broad parity between countries of different incomes, with four key messages: there is an enormous payoff from investing in health; a grand convergence in health is achievable within current lifetimes; fiscal policies are a powerful and underused lever for curbing non-communicable diseases and injuries; and progressive universalism, a pathway to universal health coverage, is an efficient way to achieve health and financial protection. This 50 page document collects evidence in support of these propositions, such as the finding that reductions in mortality accounted for 11% of recent economic growth in low- and middle-income countries; and the impact on health and revenues of taxes on tobacco and other harmful substances and reducing subsidies on fossil fuels.
NEJM
An editorial by Doran and colleagues in the December 19 NEJM describes an attempt by New York state to improve population health outcomes by targetting stable accommodation for vulnerable people.35 The authors note that the United States ranks first in health care spending but 25th in spending on social services, and speculate that inadequate social spending causes increased health spending, with the 1.5 million Americans who experience homelessness in any given year over-represented amongst the highest users of expensive hospital care. The intervention provides supportive housing for high-risk homeless patients in shelters and those in nursing homes for the lack of alternative accommodation, based on evidence that costs of supportive housing are offset by reduced service costs. The authors argue that the implementation of the Affordable Care Act will bring most of the United States’ homeless into the Medicaid system, which provides the opportunity to realise both cost reductions and improved health by addressing the social determinants of health.
The 26 December issue of the NEJM includes a case from the Massachusetts General Hospital on a 36 year old man presenting with agitation and paranoia shortly after ingesting bath salts.36 The case report includes input from specialists in emergency medicine, psychiatry, and pathology. Along with a detailed explanation of the pathology techniques used to investigate possible toxins, the case illustrates the difficulties of accurate diagnosis and timely management of patients who present with unclear histories including novel substances which may not be detected by existing tests. The article outlines the chemical properties of bath salts, which are synthetic derivatives of cathinone, a sympathomimetic chemical found in the khat plant, itself a recreational substance used mainly in the middle east and Africa.
Focus section – Substance Induced Psychosis
This month Australian Psychiatry Review examines illicit substance induced psychosis research. Despite recent interest in this area the empirical base remains slight. Most of the research focuses on cannabis and amphetamines, because of the prevalence of cannabis use in the general population, the rapid psychotogenic potential of amphetamines, and the use of amphetamines in animal models of psychosis. The review concentrates on how illicit substance use affects the onset, course, and treatment of psychosis.
The main points to be derived from the current literature include:
- There is a high rate of substance abuse in people presenting with psychotic symptoms
- There is a high rate of transition to frank psychotic diagnoses amongst people presenting with substance induced psychoses
- Substances do not cause stable schizophreniform syndromes in the absence of other predisposing factors
- Substance abuse is associated with reduced age of onset of psychosis, non-adherence to treatment, and poor clinical and functional outcomes
- The phenomenology of acute substance-induced psychotic episodes does not reliably distinguish them from primary psychotic episodes
- There is almost no empirical basis guiding treatment of substance-induced psychosis
- Reduction of illicit substance use in patients presenting with psychosis can improve function, though this is not mediated by improved psychiatric symptoms
Outline
This review will
- outline common classes of illicit substances linked with psychosis
- review basic epidemiology
- chart the natural history of amphetamine and cannabis induced psychosis
- outline attempts to differentiate substance-induced and primary psychotic illness
- discuss evidence regarding the causal role of cannabis and amphetamines in transition to psychosis
- and examine treatment and prognostic research
To keep the podcast to a reasonable length sections on drug models of psychosis, psychosocial treatments of drug-induced psychosis, and approaches to comorbid psychosis and substance abuse have been postponed.
Classes
Murray and colleagues identify the main illicit substances associated with psychosis, including lysergic acid diethylamide (or LSD), amphetamines, ketamine, and cannabis.37 Intoxication with LSD induces incapacitating hallucinations, primarily in the visual system, associated mainly with dysregulation of the serotonergic system. Amphetamines produce a reasonable approximation of acute paranoid psychosis in previously non-psychotic people, and exacerbate psychotic symptoms in ⅓ of patients with schizophrenia, associated with increased dopamine activity. The glutamate antagonists ketamine and phencyclidine induce psychotic episodes with delusions, hallucinations, and negative symptoms including impaired attention. Cannabis intoxication can be associated with psychotic episodes characterised by delusions, perceptual disturbances, disorganised thought, depersonalisation, temporal distortion, blunted affect, reduced rapport, psychomotor retardation, and emotional withdrawal, associated with activation of the endocannabinoid system.38
Epidemiology
First, we will consider the basic epidemiology of illicit substance induced psychosis.
The high and increasing prevalence of substance abuse in patients with psychotic illness is demonstrated by the Survey of High Impact Psychosis (or SHIP) conducted in 2010.39,40 The SHIP was the second national survey of psychosis in Australia, using methodology broadly similar to the first in 1998. SHIP showed that the lifetime prevalence of alcohol use disorders in patients with ICD-10 psychotic diagnoses increased from 29% in 1998 to 50% in 2010, and that the lifetime prevalence of drug use disorders increased from 30% to 56%. These high rates have been repeated in a large US-based genomic study.41
Lifetime prevalence of cannabis use in western samples at the end of secondary school has been reported to be as high as 50%, with one study finding more than 15% of senior high school students claiming to have used cannabis daily for at least a month.42
A Finnish registry study on 18,000 people with substance-induced psychosis found that 85% were alcohol-induced, 4.5% were amphetamine induced, and 0.7% were cannabis-induced.43
Natural history of substance induced psychoses
Now we will examine the natural history of amphetamine and cannabis-induced psychosis.
Acute methamphetamine use produces euphoria, and tolerance develops with prolonged use, leading to a binge pattern of use.44 Initial methamphetamine intoxication is not frequently associated with psychosis, but increasing use motivated by tolerance can lead to toxicity, marked by persecutory delusions, auditory and visual hallucinations, and hypervigilance. Psychotic symptoms triggered by chronic amphetamine abuse may last for months to years after sobriety, with delusions and hallucinations quickly resolving but behavioural disturbance such as aggression more persistent. Japanese studies have shown that psychotic symptoms arise in up to 80% of active amphetamine users, on average after five years of use. Psychotic symptoms resolve within 10 days of admission and treatment in 58% of patients, within one month in 31%, and persist longer than one month in 11%. Risk factors for the development of amphetamine psychosis include neurologic disorders during childhood and genetic loading for psychotic illness.
Power and colleagues used the Survey of High Impact Psychosis to tell whether age at initiation of cannabis use or amphetamine use predicted age at onset of psychosis.45 Their model suggested a trend towards a direct relationship of mean 7-8 years between age at onset of cannabis use and age at onset of psychosis,46 and of mean 5.3 years between age at onset of amphetamine use and age at onset of psychosis.45 Further modeling suggested that the amphetamine relationship was spurious, caused by the fact that almost 100% of amphetamine users had also used cannabis, with cannbis use starting 2-3 years earlier than amphetamine use. Elsewhere the same authors have suggested that the addition of each additional illicit substance reduces the age at onset of psychosis by one year.47
While the literature often speaks of age of onset of psychosis, it is important to realise that the onset of psychosis with amphetamine is more likely to be associated with transient psychotic experiences which vary with the amphetamine dose, while cannabis is more often linked with transition to stable psychotic illness. McKetin and colleagues explored dose-related psychotic symptoms in chronic methamphetamine users in a prospective, longitudinal study.48 They measured level of substance use and psychotic symptoms in 278 methamphetamine dependent patients without schizophrenia or history of mania over a 3 year period. McKetin and colleagues found a large dose-dependent increase in prevalence of psychotic symptoms during periods of methamphetamine use, from 7% at drug-free baseline to 48% during periods of heavy use. Prevalence was increased further with comorbid cannabis or alcohol use, up to 69%.
Differentiating substance induced psychosis and primary psychosis
Now we will consider efforts to differentiate substance-induced and primary psychosis.
Goerke and colleagues propose that DSM and ICD characterisations of substance induced psychosis and primary psychotic disorders are too simple to differentiate substance induced psychosis from a primary psychotic disorder with co-occurring substance use.49 They report that there are instruments, such as the Psychiatric Research Interview for DSM-IV Substance and Mental Disorders (or PRISM-IV), which can reliably make this differentiation at initial presentation. However, up to 50% of patients diagnosed with substance induced psychosis at presentation transition to a primary psychotic disorder over the next few years.43,50 Goerke and colleagues explain that the phenomenological similarity of substance-induced and primary psychosis means people presenting in the ultra-high risk phase of a developing psychotic illness will meet criteria for substance-induced psychosis, and that their diagnosis will change when the primary illness manifests. The high rate of conversion to frank psychotic illness may eliminate the usefulness of differentiating between substance-induced and primary psychotic diagnoses, leading Goerke and colleagues to recommend use of a spectrum of risk for psychotic illness in formulating an effective treatment plan, for those presenting with a substance induced psychosis.
Bramness and colleagues explore whether amphetamine induced psychosis is a separate diagnostic entity from primary psychosis, or whether it triggers primary psychosis in people predisposed to psychosis.51 They note that acute substance induced psychosis is associated with more rapid recovery that is more complete than schizophrenic controls, and that there is an increased vulnerability for acute amphetamine psychosis in people with a primary psychotic disorder. They identify genes which increase the probability of both amphetamine induced psychosis and schizophrenia, which probably lower the threshold for psychosis and increase the probability of a poorer clinical course of the disease.
Ross and Peselow provide a summary of what is known of the neurobiology underlying substance induced and primary psychosis, and use this to justify an approach to accurate diagnosis of patients presenting with psychosis and substance use.52 Essentially they advocate collecting detailed information regarding the pattern, intensity, and diversity of substance use, alongside the pattern and history of psychiatric symptoms, with attention to risk factors for psychotic illness and substance abuse. Temporal relationships between substance use and symptoms are important though they may not be definitive. They discuss screening, physical examination, and investigations, and incorporate these in an approach to formulation that considers the possibility of co-occurring, aetiologic, and hybrid models linking substance use and psychosis. Conceptually, associations between substance use and psychosis can arise because substance use influences psychosis, because psychosis influences substance use, or because a third factor influences both psychosis and substance use. An example of the latter would be a genetic variant which increases both the reinforcing effects of substance abuse and the probability of psychosis could lead to an non-causal association between substance use and psychosis.
Transition to psychosis
We will now turn to evidence on the rate and mechanisms of transition to primary psychotic disorder in people with a history of substance induced psychosis.
Longitudinal studies have shown high rates of transition to psychosis amongst people with substance abuse in the absence of psychosis at baseline assessment. van Os and colleagues reported a three year follow-up of 4000 psychosis free people and 60 people with psychosis in the Netherlands.53 Baseline cannabis use was the best predictor of later psychosis in psychosis-free people as well as the severity of psychosis in currently psychotic people.
Rates of transition to psychosis have been best characterised in cannabis users. Goerke and colleagues review evidence that, despite high rates of psychotic symptoms among cannabis users, only a minority develop primary psychotic disorders.49 They conclude that cannabis use alone is not sufficient to cause permanent psychotic illness, but is an additive risk factor in those with predisposing risks such as genetic vulnerability. Cannabis use may worsen the severity of psychotic disorders in those who do transition, increasing brain atrophy, and decreasing the age of onset at the first episode of psychosis.
Niemi-Pynttari and colleagues followed all 18,000 patients with a diagnosis of substance induced psychosis using the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register from first admission between 1987 and 2003.43 They found an eight year cumulative risk of transition to a schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis of 46% for cannabis-induced psychosis, and 30% for amphetamine-induced psychosis. While alcohol-induced psychosis was the most common cause of acute substance-induced psychosis, only 5% made the transition to the schizophrenia spectrum over 8 years. The majority of transitions occurred during the first 3 years after the index treatment, especially for cannabis-induced psychosis.
Theories of the mechanisms linking cannabis and psychosis tend to focus on the importance of neurodevelopment in the adolescent and young adult years, when cannabis use is most prevalent, and the prefrontal cortex completes its long developmental trajectory. Bossong and colleagues suggest that adolescent exposure to THC disturbs physiological control of glutamate and GABA release, interrupting experience-dependent maturation of neural circuits involving the prefrontal cortex, and increasing the probability of psychotic illness by overpruning of the neuropil.54
Multiple reviews of the relationship between cannabis abuse and psychosis have found that heavy cannabis use at an early age, in association with a genetic loading for psychotic illness, and exposure to environmental stressors including childhood trauma, increase the risk of psychotic outcome in later life.55,56 Cannabis appears to increase the risk of psychosis in people with genetic or environmental vulnerabilities, though by itself it is neither a necessary nor a sufficient cause of psychosis. Parakh and Basu describe evidence against the hypothesis that predisposition to psychotic illness increases the probability of cannabis use, primarily longitudinal studies which excluded patients with psychosis at baseline but still found increased risk of psychosis in cannabis users, as well as a study which reported that age at initiation of cannabis use predicts the age at onset of psychosis, with cannabis initiation predating psychosis by 7 years.55
Proal and colleagues studied whether familial risk for schizophrenia mediates the association between adolescent cannabis use and schizophrenia.57 They recruited 279 people from four groups: non-psychotic groups with no drug use, non-psychotic controls with cannabis use, schizophrenia spectrum patients with no drug use, and schizophrenia spectrum patients with adolescent cannabis use in the absence of other substance use. They found an increased prevalence of schizophrenia in relatives of both cannabis-using and non-using patients with psychosis, indicating that an increased familial risk for schizophrenia may be the underlying basis for schizophrenia in cannabis users and not cannabis use per se.
Auther and colleagues compared 101 patients at high risk of psychotic illness to healthy controls on rates of substance abuse, including cannabis.58 High risk patients had a significantly higher lifetime rate of cannabis use than healthy controls. Logistic regression analyses suggested that conversion to psychosis in high-risk patients was not related to lifetime cannabis use or the presence of attenuated positive psychotic symptoms at baseline. They discuss two previous studies which also found cannabis use did not predict psychosis, and one study which found that cannabis did predict psychosis, attributing the differences to methodological differences.
Impact on established psychotic illness
Now we will briefly consider the impact of cannabis on established psychotic disorder.
Acknowledging evidence that cannabis is a potent predictor of the earlier onset of psychosis Barrowclough and colleagues explored whether cannabis is associated with outcomes in established psychotic illness.59 160 patients with psychotic illness and cannabis use were compared with 167 patients who use other substances, with repeated measures at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months. Cannabis users did not differ from other substance users on measures of positive symptoms, cannabis dose was not associated with subsequent severity of positive symptoms, and change in cannabis dose did not predict change in positive symptom severity, even with abstinence. However, greater cannabis use was associated with worse function. The authors acknowledge four previous studies which did find associations between cannabis exposure and positive symptoms, which they attribute to differences in methodology and study populations, noting that their own study includes four times as many subjects as the largest of the older research. Nevertheless, they conclude that not all patients with nonaffective psychosis will show improved psychiatric symptoms with reduced cannabis use.
Treatment considerations
Finally, we will consider the treatment and prognostic implications of substance-induced psychosis. A common theme throughout this literature is the paucity of treatment evidence, often ascribed to the practice of excluding patients with comorbid substance abuse from antipsychotic trials.
In an overview of substance-induced psychosis, noting the lack of empirical guidance, Goerke and colleagues emphasise the importance of engaging families in the treatment of patients with psychotic illness of whatever cause, and recommend equal attention to the reduction of substance use and control of psychiatric symptoms.49 Given the uncertainties of diagnosis, engagement, and treatment, they also recommend frequent contact in the early stages of illness, consistent with the early intervention paradigm.60
Substance use is a strong predictor of disengagement from treatment and therefore has been recommended as a treatment target,49 although there is limited evidence that interventions change engagement or outcomes.
A Cochrane review of treatment for amphetamine-induced psychosis in 2009 found only one RCT comparing 58 patients with amphetamine psychosis with olanzapine versus haloperidol treatment.61 Both showed significant improvements, with olanzapine showing significantly fewer extrapyramidal side effects.
In their prospective longitudinal study of dose-related psychotic symptoms in chronic methamphetamine users, McKetin and colleagues state that there is insufficient evidence to make clinical recommendations regarding treatment of methamphetamine psychosis, and identify the need for protocols for the emergency psychiatric management of these patients.48 They note that most patients’ psychotic symptoms abate during periods of abstinence, though a small minority experience chronic psychosis. McKetin and colleagues were unable to conclude that amphetamine dependence causes psychotic illness.
Farnia and colleagues report a RCT of 45 patients with amphetamine induced psychotic symptoms randomised to aripiprazole 15mg daily or risperidone 4mg daily for 6 weeks.62 Both groups saw clinically meaningful reductions on the Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms and Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms, with risperidone more effective for positive symptoms and aripiprazole more effective for negative symptoms.
Weibell and colleagues compared Norwegian patients with substance induced psychosis to those with primary psychotic disorders with and without substance misuse, finding that those with primary psychotic illness were more often treated, and those with substance misuse were more likely to be male.63 DUP was shorter in the substance-induced group, and this group had more positive symptoms on the PANSS.
Vallee and colleagues propose a novel protective therapy for cannabis intoxication from the observation that tetrahydrocannabinol, the main active agent of cannabis, substantially increases the synthesis of pregnenolone via the type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1).64 Using pregnenolone as a specific inhibitor of the CB1 receptor in a feedback loop Vallee and colleagues showed that they could reduce behavioural analogs of THC intoxication in mice models.
Recent reviews of the dual diagnosis literature conclude that efficacious treatments for reducing psychiatric symptoms also work in patients with comorbid substance and psychiatric symptoms; treatments that reduce substance use also work in patients with comorbid substance and psychiatric symptoms; and the efficacy of integrated treatment that attempts to address both psychiatric symptoms and substance disorders is unclear.65,66
Prognosis
Research on the prognosis of patients with psychosis and substance use disorders is as limited and contradictory as the rest of the field.
The combination of substance use and psychotic illness has consistently been linked with worse outcomes than psychotic illness alone, though consistent patterns are difficult to find in the literature. Reviews indicate that these patients experience worse developmental outcomes, particularly incomplete education, unemployment, depression, criminal behaviour, homelessness, re-hospitalisation, violence, and suicidal behaviour.67,68
A recent systematic review compared patients with psychotic illness who have stopped using substances, with those who have never used substances.69 There were no significant differences on positive or negative symptoms, depression, or global function. The same authors also compared outcomes of patients with psychotic disorders and a history of but no current substance use, to patients with psychotic disorders and ongoing substance abuse. There was evidence of improved positive symptoms, mood symptoms, and function in patients with first episode psychosis who stopped substance use, but no evidence of improvement in patients with more established psychotic illness.70
Koola and colleagues examined the effect of substance use on mortality over 4-10 years in 762 people with psychotic disorders using public records in Maryland.71 Mortality was higher in males, but lower in cannabis users. Alcohol use was not predictive of mortality. Koola and colleagues speculate about potential protective effects of anti-inflammatory properties of the endocannabinoid system.
A systematic review by Alvarez-Jiminez and colleagues reported that while clinical and demographic variables have little effect on relapse rates after a first-episode of psychosis, persistent substance abuse disorder was ranked close to medication non-adherence as a factor increasing the probability of relapse.72
Summary of Focus Section on Substance-Induced Psychosis
In summary, the literature regarding substance-induced psychosis is far from definitive. Current results suggest that there is a high rate of substance use in patients presenting with psychotic symptoms, that there is a high transition to stable psychotic disorders in these patients, and that the outcomes with comorbid substance abuse and psychosis are worse than either condition alone across clinical, social, and functional domains. Early cannabis use, and possibly polysubstance abuse, is associated with earlier age at onset of psychosis, though neither cannabis nor other substances appear to be a sufficient cause of psychotic illness in the absence of other predisposing factors. Reducing substance use appears to improve function, though probably not by improving psychiatric symptoms. Finally, treatments that work for psychosis or substance use alone appear to work for combined presentations.
Conclusion
And that’s it for the January edition of Australian Psychiatry Review. Listeners directed to the podcast from the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatry’s CPD Online page can access questions for CPD points using the password “substance”. See you next month!
References
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
1. Malhi GS. New Year revolutions? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2013;48(1):5–6. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24366947. Accessed December 24, 2013.
2. Middleton W, Stavropoulos P, Dorahy MJ, et al. The Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2013;48(1):17–21. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24366951. Accessed December 24, 2013.
3. Middleton W, Stavropoulos P, Dorahy MJ, et al. Institutional abuse and societal silence: An emerging global problem. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2013;48(1):22–25. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24366952. Accessed December 24, 2013.
4. McGrath JJ. The John Cade Fellowship: Modifiable risk factors for serious mental illness. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2013;48(1):13–16. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24366950. Accessed December 24, 2013.
5. Christensen H. Proposal for the John Cade Fellowship. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2013;48(1):10–12. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24366949. Accessed December 24, 2013.
American Journal of Psychiatry
6. Drake RE, Frey W, Bond GR, et al. Assisting Social Security Disability Insurance Beneficiaries With Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, or Major Depression in Returning to Work. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2013;170(12):1433–1441. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23929355.
7. Frank RG. Helping (Some) SSDI Beneficiaries With Severe Mental Illness Return to Work. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2013;170(12):1379–1381. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24306332.
8. Swanson JW, Van Dorn R a, Swartz MS, et al. The cost of assisted outpatient treatment: can it save States money? American Journal of Psychiatry. 2013;170(12):1423–32. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23896998.
British Journal of Psychiatry
9. Thirlwall K, Cooper PJ, Karalus J, Voysey M, Willetts L, Creswell C. Treatment of child anxiety disorders via guided parent-delivered cognitive-behavioural therapy: randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2013;203:436–44. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23969483. Accessed December 4, 2013.
10. Cartwright-Hatton S. Treating anxiety in early life. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2013;203(6):401–402. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24297785. Accessed December 4, 2013.
11. Rugkåsa J, Dawson J. Community treatment orders: current evidence and the implications. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2013;203:406–8. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24297787. Accessed December 11, 2013.
12. Milner A, Spittal MJ, Pirkis J, LaMontagne a. D. Suicide by occupation: systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2013;203(6):409–416. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24297788. Accessed December 4, 2013.
JAMA Psychiatry
13. Lane H-Y, Lin C-H, Green MF, et al. Add-on Treatment of Benzoate for Schizophrenia: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of d-Amino Acid Oxidase Inhibitor. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;90509(12):1267–1275. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24089054. Accessed November 8, 2013.
14. Kotov R, Leong SH, Mojtabai R, et al. Boundaries of Schizoaffective Disorder: Revisiting Kraepelin. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(12):1276–1286. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24089086. Accessed November 22, 2013.
15. Kendler KS. Psychosis Within vs Outside of Major Mood Episodes A Key Prognostic and Diagnostic Criterion. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(12):1263–1264. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24089012.
16. Winsper C, Singh SP, Marwaha S, et al. Pathways to Violent Behavior During First-Episode Psychosis: A Report From the UK National EDEN Study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(12):1287–93. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24089149. Accessed December 7, 2013.
17. Wilson RS, Nag S, Boyle P a, et al. Brainstem aminergic nuclei and late-life depressive symptoms. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(12):1320–8. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24132763. Accessed December 9, 2013.
18. Sigmon SC, Dunn KE, Saulsgiver K, et al. A Randomized, Double-blind Evaluation of Buprenorphine Taper Duration in Primary Prescription Opioid Abusers. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(12):1347–54. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24153411. Accessed December 10, 2013.
19. Iltis AS, Misra S, Dunn LB, et al. Addressing risks to advance mental health research. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(12):1363–71. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24173618. Accessed December 9, 2013.
20. Girardin FR, Gex-Fabry M, Berney P, Shah D, Gaspoz J-M, Dayer P. Drug-Induced Long QT in Adult Psychiatric Inpatients: The 5-Year Cross-Sectional ECG Screening Outcome in Psychiatry Study. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2013;170(12):1468–76. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24306340.
Molecular Psychiatry
21. Licinio J, Wong M-L. Launching the “War on Mental Illness.” Molecular Psychiatry. 2014;19(1):1–5. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24362539. Accessed December 24, 2013.
22. Poels EMP, Kegeles LS, Kantrowitz JT, et al. Imaging glutamate in schizophrenia: review of findings and implications for drug discovery. Molecular Psychiatry. 2013;19(1):20–29. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24166406. Accessed December 12, 2013.
Neuropsychopharmacology
23. Wise RA, Koob GF. The Development and Maintenance of Drug Addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;39(2):254–262. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24121188. Accessed December 13, 2013.
Translational Psychiatry
24. Bentsen H, Osnes K, Refsum H, Solberg DK, Bøhmer T. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of an omega-3 fatty acid and vitamins E+C in schizophrenia. Translational Psychiatry. 2013;3(12):e335. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24346133. Accessed December 17, 2013.
MJA
25. Triggs G. Mental health and immigration detention. MJA. 2013;199(11):721–722. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24329615.
26. Procter NG, Leo D De, Newman L. Suicide and self-harm prevention for people in immigration detention. MJA. 2013;199(11):730–731. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24329621.
27. Deans AK, Boerma CJ, Fordyce J, De Souza M, Palmer DJ, Davis JS. Use of Royal Darwin Hospital emergency department by immigration detainees in 2011. MJA. 2013;199(December 16):776–778. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24329656.
JAMA
28. Foa EB, McLean CP, Capaldi S, Rosenfield D. Prolonged Exposure vs Supportive Counseling for Sexual Abuse–Related PTSD in Adolescent Girls. JAMA. 2013;310(24):2650. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24368465. Accessed December 25, 2013.
29. Perrin S. Prolonged Exposure Therapy for PTSD in Sexually Abused Adolescents. JAMA. 2013;310(24):2619–2620. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24368461.
Lancet
30. Vincent PD, Kouassi E. Efficacy of antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia. Lancet. 2013;382(9908):1873–4. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24315168. Accessed December 26, 2013.
31. Leucht S, Cipriani A, Spineli L, et al. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 15 antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis. Lancet. 2013;382(9896):951–962. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23810019. Accessed June 27, 2013.
32. Leucht S, Cipriani A, Geddes JR, Salanti G, Davis JM. Efficacy of antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia – Authors’ reply. Lancet. 2013;382(9908):1874–5. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24315170. Accessed December 26, 2013.
33. Siu CO, Agid O, Remington G. Efficacy of antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia. Lancet. 2013;382(9908):1874. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24315169. Accessed December 26, 2013.
34. Jamison DT, Summers LH, Alleyne G, et al. Global health 2035: a world converging within a generation. Lancet. 2013;382(9908):1898–955. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24309475. Accessed December 12, 2013.
New England Journal of Medicine
35. Doran KM, Misa EJ, Shah NR. Housing as Health Care – New York’s Boundary Crossing Experiment. New England Journal of Medicine. 2013;369(25):2374–2377. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24171507. Accessed December 21, 2013.
36. Benzer TI, Nejad S, Flood JG. Case 40-2013. New England Journal of Medicine. 2013;369(26):2536–2545. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369079. Accessed December 25, 2013.
Focus section – Substance Induced Psychosis
37. Murray RM, Paparelli A, Morrison PD, Marconi A, Di Forti M. What can we learn about schizophrenia from studying the human model, drug-induced psychosis? American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric Genetics. 2013;162B(7):661–70. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24132898. Accessed December 18, 2013.
38. D’Souza DC, Perry E, MacDougall L, et al. The psychotomimetic effects of intravenous delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in healthy individuals: implications for psychosis. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004;29(8):1558–72. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15173844. Accessed December 20, 2013.
39. Morgan VA, Waterreus A, Jablensky A V, et al. People living with psychotic illness in 2010. The second Australian national survey of psychosis. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2012. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22696547. Accessed July 31, 2012.
40. Moore E, Mancuso SG, Slade T, Galletly C, Castle DJ. The impact of alcohol and illicit drugs on people with psychosis: the second Australian National Survey of Psychosis. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2012;46(9):864–78. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22472772. Accessed January 1, 2014.
41. Hartz SM, Pato CN, Medeiros H, et al. Comorbidity of Severe Psychotic Disorders With Measures of Substance Use. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;63110:1–7. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24382686. Accessed January 4, 2014.
42. Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the Future: National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2008 Volume I Secondary School Students 2008. Bethesda, Maryland; 2008:1–758. Available at: http://www.monitoringthefuture.org/pubs/monographs/vol1_2008.pdf.
43. Niemi-Pynttäri J a, Sund R, Putkonen H, Vorma H, Wahlbeck K, Pirkola SP. Substance-induced psychoses converting into schizophrenia: a register-based study of 18,478 Finnish inpatient cases. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2013;74(1):e94–9. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23419236. Accessed December 30, 2013.
44. Zorick TS, Rad D, Rim C, Tsuang J. An Overview of Methamphetamine-induced Psychotic Syndromes. Addictive Disorders and their Treatment. 2008;7(3):143–156. Available at: http://www.laboratoriosilesia.com/upfiles/sibi/P080739.pdf. Accessed January 11, 2014.
45. Power BD, Stefanis NC, Dragovic M, Jablensky A, Castle D, Morgan VA. Age at initiation of amphetamine use and age at onset of psychosis: The Australian Survey of High Impact Psychosis. Schizophrenia Research. 2013:10–12. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24275582. Accessed January 1, 2014.
46. Stefanis NC, Dragovic M, Power BD, Jablensky A, Castle D, Morgan VA. Age at initiation of cannabis use predicts age at onset of psychosis: the 7- to 8-year trend. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2013;39(2):251–4. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23314189. Accessed January 3, 2014.
47. Power BD, Dragovic M, Jablensky A V, Stefanis NC. Does accumulating exposure to illicit drugs bring forward the age at onset in schizophrenia? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2013;47(1):51–58. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23042939. Accessed December 5, 2012.
48. McKetin R, Lubman DI, Baker AL, Dawe S, Ali RL. Dose-related psychotic symptoms in chronic methamphetamine users: evidence from a prospective longitudinal study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(3):319–24. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23303471. Accessed March 8, 2013.
49. Goerke D, Kumra S. Substance abuse and psychosis. Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America. 2013;22(4):643–54. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24012078. Accessed December 30, 2013.
50. Arendt M, Rosenberg R, Foldager L, Perto G, Munk-Jørgensen P. Cannabis-induced psychosis and subsequent schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: follow-up study of 535 incident cases. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2005;187:510–5. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16319402. Accessed December 16, 2013.
51. Bramness JG, Gundersen ØH, Guterstam J, et al. Amphetamine-induced psychosis–a separate diagnostic entity or primary psychosis triggered in the vulnerable? BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:221. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23216941. Accessed December 30, 2013.
52. Ross S, Peselow E. Co-occurring psychotic and addictive disorders: neurobiology and diagnosis. Clinical Neuropharmacology. 2012;35(5):235–43. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22986797. Accessed January 1, 2014.
53. Van Os J. Cannabis Use and Psychosis: A Longitudinal Population-based Study. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2002;156(4):319–327. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12181101. Accessed January 2, 2014.
54. Bossong MG, Niesink RJM. Adolescent brain maturation, the endogenous cannabinoid system and the neurobiology of cannabis-induced schizophrenia. Progress in neurobiology. 2010;92(3):370–85. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20624444. Accessed January 4, 2014.
55. Parakh P, Basu D. Cannabis and psychosis: have we found the missing links? Asian journal of psychiatry. 2013;6(4):281–7. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23810133. Accessed December 13, 2013.
56. Addington J, Case N, Saleem MM, Auther AM, Cornblatt B a, Cadenhead KS. Substance use in clinical high risk for psychosis: a review of the literature. Early intervention in psychiatry. 2013;(June 2010):1–9. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24224849. Accessed January 1, 2014.
57. Proal AC, Fleming J, Galvez-Buccollini J a, Delisi LE. A controlled family study of cannabis users with and without psychosis. Schizophrenia research. 2013:6–11. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24309013. Accessed January 1, 2014.
58. Auther AM, McLaughlin D, Carrión RE, Nagachandran P, Correll CU, Cornblatt B a. Prospective study of cannabis use in adolescents at clinical high risk for psychosis: impact on conversion to psychosis and functional outcome. Psychological medicine. 2012;42(12):2485–97. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22716931. Accessed January 1, 2014.
59. Barrowclough C, Emsley R, Eisner E, Beardmore R, Wykes T. Does change in cannabis use in established psychosis affect clinical outcome? Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2013;39(2):339–48. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22037770. Accessed January 1, 2014.
60. Bertelsen M, Jeppesen P, Petersen L, et al. Five-year follow-up of a randomized multicenter trial of intensive early intervention vs standard treatment for patients with a first episode of psychotic illness: the OPUS trial. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2008;65(7):762–71. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18606949.
61. Shoptaw SJ, Kao U, Ling W. Treatment for amphetamine psychosis. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2009;(1):1–19. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19160215.
62. Farnia V, Shakeri J, Tatari F, et al. Randomized controlled trial of aripiprazole versus risperidone for the treatment of amphetamine-induced psychosis. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 2014;40(1):10–5. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24359506. Accessed December 30, 2013.
63. Weibell M a, Joa I, Bramness J, et al. Treated incidence and baseline characteristics of substance induced psychosis in a Norwegian catchment area. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13(1):319. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24279887.
64. Vallee M, Vitiello S, Bellocchio L, et al. Pregnenolone Can Protect the Brain from Cannabis Intoxication. Science. 2014;343(6166):94–98. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24385629. Accessed January 3, 2014.
65. Tiet QQ, Mausbach B. Treatments for patients with dual diagnosis: a review. Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research. 2007;31(4):513–36. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17374031. Accessed January 3, 2014.
66. Murthy P, Chand P. Treatment of dual diagnosis disorders. Current Opinion in Psychiatry. 2012. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22395768. Accessed March 29, 2012.
67. Blanchard JJ, Brown S a, Horan WP, Sherwood a R. Substance use disorders in schizophrenia: review, integration, and a proposed model. Clinical psychology review. 2000;20(2):207–34. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10721498.
68. Davis M, Sheidow A, Zajac K, McCart M. Prevalence and Impact of Substance Use among Emerging Adults with Serious Mental Health Conditions. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2012;35(3):235–243. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22246122.
69. Gupta P, Mullin K, Nielssen O, Harris A, Large M. Do former substance users with psychosis differ in their symptoms or function from non-substance users? A systematic meta-analysis. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2013;47(6):524–37. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23341473. Accessed January 1, 2014.
70. Mullin K, Gupta P, Compton MT, Nielssen O, Harris A, Large M. Does giving up substance use work for patients with psychosis? A systematic meta-analysis. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2012;46(9):826–39. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22368242. Accessed January 1, 2014.
71. Koola MM, McMahon RP, Wehring HJ, et al. Alcohol and cannabis use and mortality in people with schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders. Journal of psychiatric research. 2012;46(8):987–93. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22595870. Accessed January 1, 2014.
72. Alvarez-Jimenez M, Priede a, Hetrick SE, et al. Risk factors for relapse following treatment for first episode psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Schizophrenia research. 2012;139(1-3):116–28. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22658527. Accessed January 1, 2014.